Laryngoscope, 1995 Authors: R. Roithmann, P. Cole, J. Chapnik, I. Shpirer, V. Hoffstein, N. Zamel Conclusion: “From a clinical point of view, the area-distance function curve [acoustic rhinometry] helps the clinician to differentiate objectively and quantify the mucosal and the structural component of nasal obstruction and to assess results of medical and/or surgical treatment. AR…
Clinical Otolaryngology, 1994 Authors: G. K. Scadding, Y. C. Darby, and C. E. Austin Conclusion: “Acoustic rhinometry has a definite advantage [to rhinomanometry] because it is not dependent on airflow in the nose, and it is therefore suitable for severely congested individuals. It also appears to be more sensitive to changes in obstruction, probably because…
American Journal of Rhinology, 1994 Authors: V. W. S. Lai, J. P. Corey Conclusion: “Acoustic Rhinometry is a reliable technique for assessing the results of nasal provocation. This is a simple test to perform and is a good objective evaluation of the degree of nasal patency. Results are obtained quickly and consistently and are highly…
Ear, Nose, and Throat Journal, 1993 Authors: V. W. S. Lai, MD and J. P. Corey, MD, FACS Conclusion: “Acoustic Rhinometry may become a helpful diagnostic tool as use of the technique grows. It may help the clinician in making an anatomical diagnosis to pinpoint the location and etiologic factors causing nasal obstruction. It also…
The Journal of Laryngology and Otology, 1993 Authors: L.F. Grymer, P. Illum, O. Hilberg Conclusion: “Septoplasty increased the areas of the narrow side significantly in both groups. The increase in area in group B was surprisingly little. This is probably an expression of the limitation of septoplasty in the treatment of slight septal deviations. The…
Rhinology, 1990
Authors: H. Lenders and W. Pirsig
Conclusion: “